Gwendolen StSauveur
Username
Gwendolen St.Sauveur
Proposer First Name
Gwendolen
Proposer Email
gwendolen@bitethefrost.com
Proposer Last Name
St.Sauveur, EI LEED GA
Proposer Company/Organization
BTF Net Zero Designs
Proposer Phone
(802) 392-3395
Proposer Job Title
CEO | Architectural & Mechanical HVAC Design Consultant
Boston 2023 Areas of Focus
Proposer Additional Info
Quick Bio: Gwendolen St.Sauveur EI LEED GA, Founder of BTF Net Zero Designs:
Over more than a decade & through hundreds of commercial and residential projects nationwide I’ve worn the various hats of: Mechanical Engineer, MEP Designer, Architectural Designer, Construction Coordinator & Estimator.
My journey began working for a local lumber company as a residential estimator & designer. I soon continued my education and upon graduation, I fell into a MEP opportunity which shifted into my becoming a mechanical engineer.
For nearly a decade I worked as a mechanical engineer in both realms: consulting and construction.
For a mid-size multi-disciplined engineering firm, I gained hands on experience in a dizzying array of commercial projects. I was responsible for designs ranging from city sized steam heating plants & luxury hotels to nuclear imaging hospital suites and elementary school renovations. For nearly every project energy modeling was part of the process - leaving me with extensive energy modeling experience. After consulting I gained fabrication and in-field installation experience working as a mechanical engineer and construction coordinator for a mid-scale HVAC contractor.
Seeing a gap to be filled in the residential market:
In 2015 I launched BTF Designs, with the goal of merging residential architecture & engineering like never before: www.bitethefrost.com.
A.S. Architectural & Building Engineering Technology.
B.S. Construction Practices & Management.
I enjoy problem solving and finding creative solutions.
A favorite quote, "Quality is not an act, it is a habit" - Aristotle
Proposed Session Description
For us to achieve zero emissions at scale, creating accurate energy models must be accessible to all industry professionals.
Moving towards a sustainable & emission free future, energy modeling should be used as a tool for decision making. Not only for sizing equipment, but also for selecting materials & shaping buildings.
When used early in the design process, energy modeling can provide unparalleled construction & carbon savings.
In this technical seminar you'll be provided the tools & training to create your own energy models. As well as learn what to look for in the energy models of others.
This training is applicable for all areas of construction, be it new or retro-fit, commercial or residential.
Diversity and Inclusiveness
Already the industry is shifting to question these 'magic 8 ball' models. Architects, contractors & designers in many disciples are asking questions around green materials, best design practices and energy savings. What better way to empower our fellow members of the construction industry - than to give them the tools to answer some of their own questions!
As energy modeling is often learned on the job - there are inherently limited learning opportunities.
Most of those opportunities limited to those pursuing a carrier in the field of mechanical engineering.
It is a perfect tribute to equity, in offering a unique training resource such as this.
Learning Objectives
Constructively address & visually identify basic thermodynamic principles affecting building energy usage.
Integrate building science attributes such as internal gains, infiltration, building assemblies, HVAC selections, climate zones, weather patterns ect. to create accurate & detailed energy model parameters.
Develop initial energy models for existing, new, residential and light commercial construction projects.
Compare & analyze architectural design features and construction means & materials to make informed decisions early within the design process.
Has this session been presented before?
No
Additional Comments
There are a few local architectural firms who have asked me to present this topic as a lunch & learn. I plan to do so this winter.
I've also offered to present this topic for Efficiency Vermont, either as part of their contractor trainings in the EEN program or as part of Better Buildings - nothing yet confirmed.
Session Format
Workshop or skill-building session
Session Format Details
Power point presentation, broken up into 3 main "parts or blocks" with space for questions between each block and at the end.
I also plan to provide a handout - a "quick-sheet guide" - for ease of future reference when folks try their own energy models later on.
Recommended Length
60-minute session
90-minute session
Strongest Content Connection - Boston 2023
Comments about your speaker roster
I feel it is important to briefly describe the expansive energy modeling experience that I have.
For more than decade I've had the privilege of designing mechanical systems and equipment for projects large and small. I've performed the energy models on hundreds of mid-to-large scale commercial projects. As well as hundreds of residential projects. My largest energy model - Half of a city. We were replacing a central city steam heating system serving dozens of historical buildings including courthouses, libraries, maintenance shops ect. My smallest energy model - A 300sf off the grid property. Every model is unique and often complicated. I plan to include in my presentation the warnings of how easily an energy model can be flawed - and the importance of running a second model to check the first!
Anything else you'd like to tell us about your session proposal?
60 or 90 minutes would be great for this session!
In running through my latest outline it would be a dense 60 minutes - so if at all possible I would love a mid-morning slot - but more importantly hope to avoid the sleepy 'Just after lunch' slot!
Thank-you so much & see you soon!
Reviewer 1
Tilton, Clay
Reviewer 2
Widjaja, Karno
Proposal #
119
Committee Decision
Being Considered
Presenters
Full Description
Energy modeling education lines up perfectly with the conference theme of "Scalable Solutions." Currently, a typical large project design process would rattle through the different disciplines in the order of: Site/Civil, Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Fire-protection then finally construction. Today energy modeling is done by the mechanical engineers - at one time - in the middle of the design process. Too far along to make any significant changes which could provide unparalleled energy savings. At this point energy modeling is used primarily for sizing mechanical equipment. Where it could be used as a decision making tool. Shifting walls, moving windows, adjusting materials in the envelope assemblies, and simplifying the exterior shape of the building are examples where architectural decisions can significantly reduce heating and cooling loads in a building.
In developing the stock net zero designs of BTF - we discovered how much of an impact energy modeling can make. Especially when referenced in the architectural design phase. In our initial design experiments we created an ideal energy model first. Using that model we then developed architectural designs that matched it. We designed in the opposite of common practice. Switching the order from running an energy model only after a complete architectural design - to designing from the model itself.
While this may be more complicated than the industry is ready for, it did shed light on the significance that energy modeling can play. And that each of the disciplines, not only mechanical, can make better informed decisions by using energy models.
As it is now, energy modeling is often learned on the job. And very limited is the nationwide resource of designers and engineers who can perform accurate energy models. There is simply not the available manpower to develop energy models for many multiple iterations. For us to make significant change in the energy demands of our buildings we can not rely on expensive high end materials, but we must design efficient shapes and assemblies too. We need to support and empower a larger network of energy modeling based decisions. To do this we must simply share the tools and education for everyone to develop basic energy models in house.