Skip to main content
Username
Jodi Smits Anderson
Proposer First Name
Jodi
Proposer Email
greenerjsa@gmail.com
Proposer Last Name
Smits Anderson
Proposer Company/Organization
Page
Proposer Phone
(518) 229-3215
Proposer Job Title
Managing Principal, Albany
Proposed Session Description
Existing Buildings – the title of Chapter 5 of the Energy Conservation Construction Code – is an area with great potential to reduce energy demand. This session will not just dive deeply into Chapter 5 and how to upgrade and revitalize existing buildings to be code compliant (and better) but will use stories of practice so that Chapter 5 comes alive in your work. Shared examples include full rehabilitation projects as well as code-savvy interventions such as reroofing, window replacement, and building additions that meet the energy comfort, durability, resilience goals of your clients.
Diversity and Inclusiveness
It does not address this directly, however the question leads me to believe we can make the point more clear that repurposing existing buildings and doing so well will protect urban fabric, sane money for owners and tenants, and reduce GHG emissions, all of which can reduce cost volatility for all and make cities habitable for all. We could seek an example especially of healthy building outcomes.
Learning Objectives
Understand and rigorously apply Chapter 5 in all your work as required by Code
Define 2-3 interventions you can detail now for continued use in work in the future
Describe the difference between energy code compliance and a comprehensive energy upgrade
How COMcheck (or REScheck) can help and where it does not
Has this session been presented before?
No
Additional Comments
JIm and Jodi have exceptional and comfortable rapport in delivering content. This team has often been touted as the most engaging presenters of the conferences they have taken part in.
Session Format
Presentation followed by facilitated discussion or breakout groups
Session Format Details
Information and case study segments with integral QnA.

Strongest Content Connection - Boston 2023

Reviewer 1
Craig, Beverly
Proposal #
132
Committee Decision
Rejected
Full Description
Jim and Jodi have been teaching NYS Energy Code classes in NYS for years (the NYS Energy Conservation Construction Code is based on the IECC). It is a wonderful full-day course which points to Chapter 5 and says, in brief, “if you touch anything in an existing building, you need to do all the energy code compliance stuff we covered in the rest of the Code, with a few exceptions”. But what does this REALLY mean? How can we help designers and owners understand two key things 1) we can do this work very well and in compliance with code, or we can create problems for the buildings and risk for our firms, and 2) our future work will have to engage in MANY more modernizations projects and retrofit work if we are to meet climate goals in our communities, states and the nation. We have found that there is a lot of misunderstanding about energy code requirements for existing building projects. This includes the belief that some aspects are impossible to comply with. Combined with spotty enforcement, it has created a slippery slope! Designers need to realize that the energy codes can and must be followed. Only then can we reap the benefits that come with reducing energy usage in existing buildings