Skip to main content
Username
Amanda Hanley
Proposer First Name
Amanda
Proposer Email
ahanley@elkus-manfredi.com
Proposer Last Name
Hanley
Proposer Phone
(617) 426-1300
Proposer Job Title
Marketing
Proposed Session Description
Panelists will present a case study of Emerson College’s reinvigorated Little Building.The project utilized a hybrid preservation/renovation approach using aerospace technology and innovative materials to cleverly extend the life and square footage of the building. By salvaging the majority of the building’s structure and portions of the façade, the team was able to significantly reduce new carbon creation.
Why is this session important?
This session will be an honest discussion about the multitude of decisions and trade-offs encountered during a complex building renovation project. Together, the design and construction team will give attendees a realistic understanding of the overall process, trade-offs made in choosing materials, and the challenges of balancing different priorities—such as energy conservation and emissions reduction vs. historical accuracy—alongside budget, schedule, and programming constraints. We will look at how to economize and maximize space in an existing footprint in a tight urban campus that needed to grow and provide more student housing. The team was able to add much-desired social space in new glass lightwells inserted between the original building’s three “fingers,” forming double-height common spaces, as well as added bed capacity on the 13th floor, built in behind an existing parapet. The project was also one where the design team engaged with our 3D fab lab on exploring ways to use technology to deliver innovative solutions. By commissioning a digital laser scan to capture façade details and defects down to 0.025mm, the resulting representations directed the creation of physical models and molds using 3D printers and a 5-axis CNC mill. This gave the team an opportunity to refine defects and directly share models with the fabrication company. Ultimately, the session will illustrate an argument for re-using/repurposing existing structures as a means for reducing embodied carbon.
Diversity and Inclusiveness
Without cross-functional collaboration, this project would have not come to pass. Members of the College's administration, the design team, and community worked together to preserve and restore the Little Building. Multiple meetings culminated in over 16 entitlement presentations held with design commissions, redevelopment authorities, city council members, historical commissions, neighborhood associations, as well as multiple public meetings – all crucial to including external stakeholder voices and establishing lasting connections.
Learning Objectives
1. Evaluate whether to keep an historic building or tear down, factoring in construction methods, cost, schedule, and sustainability goals
2. Explore the particular issue of embodied carbon in building materials and how to evaluate and assess the value of a whole building LCA.
3. Apply panelized construction and digital scanning methods to potentially reduce cost and schedule
4. Apply lessons learned from mistakes and successes during construction of similar type buildings
Has this session been presented before?
Yes
When and Where?
Elements of this project have been presented before at the ArchitectureBoston Expo, the Boston Society of Architects, Boston Preservation Alliance, Facades Plus and Zak World of Façades.
Target Audiences Level of Expertise
Level 2 - Some prior knowledge helpful.

Strongest Content Connection - NYC 2023

Comments about your speaker roster
Ross and Katie worked closely on the Little Building project, and have an easy rapport.
Anything else you'd like to tell us about your session proposal?
Just as Boston is implementing BERDO, New York City has enacted Local Law 97 to drive deep emissions cuts, placing carbon caps on most buildings larger than 25,000 square feet — covering nearly 50,000 properties across NYC. We believe the lessons learned on the Little Building can contribute to the challenges facing existing building stock in meeting these requirements.
Reviewer 1
Royan, Monisha
Reviewer 2
O'Hagan, Kristy
Proposal #
149
Committee Decision
Being Considered