Collaboration to Reduce Carbon Emissions: It’s fun to save at the Y-M-C-A (of Greater New York)
Comments
Round 1 - MAYBE.
Round 1 - MAYBE.The proposal claims that that LL88 is not well know, but doesn't present any evidence about the projected number of buildings that still need to comply. The technology itself is pretty well understood (at least the lighting upgrades that are described here) and since it's required already, the project doesn't seem to represent an innovative appoach, or highlight best practices that are usually ignored. Not sure what the audience would walk away with that would be new to them.
Round 2 comments: Maybe.
Round 2 comments: Maybe. I spoke to Jie Li, Andrew Letwin, and Gianna Zapiti on 5/26. The concept is as descirbed. Andrew and Gianna led a lighting project upgrade at 22-23 buildings for YMCA, not initially driven by LL88 compliance but project team decided to make it comply with LL88. The sites represent a wide range of building typologies and use spaces. The crucial finding is that these projects can take a year or more to do correctly and bring the site up to the new lighting code. That means buildings need to get start this process now in order to comply with LL88/LL134.First the cons: 1) They mentioned that there's currently no penalty outlined by DOB for noncompliance. They have ignored the rule so far because of all the attention on LL97 implementation. So the premise that buiding owners need to act or face penalties feels thin. 2) The session has a strong business development feel. Hire this firm now. 3) There doesn't seems to be anything new here in terms of a technology or strategy or even project management approach. 4) Building owners should do there retrofits but code and lighting standard upgrades should make these projects standard, albeit not at the speed of LL88 compliance. Pros: 1) Great representation in speakers, from the client, implementation firm, and consultants. 2) There's very little attention currently, I think, on the coming lighting upgrade requirements. 3) The session seems developed and organized already. 4) the technology is a proven way to reduce emissions or operating costs.
Hi Elihu, this is from my
Hi Elihu, this is from my company so I'm going to recuse myself =)