Skip to main content
Username
Katie Bartolotta
Proposer First Name
Katie
Proposer Email
kbartolotta@greenbuildingunited.org
Proposer Last Name
Bartolotta

Boston 2021 Areas of Focus

Proposer Company/Organization
Green Building United
Proposer Phone
(215) 399-5789
Proposer Job Title
Policy and Programs Director
Proposed Session Description
With many states incentivizing housing built to Passive standard, everyone wants to know: are Passive-certified multifamily buildings really achieving better energy performance? The answer is yes. With many built multi-family passive projects throughout the Northeast, there are now multiple projects where we can look at actual energy performance data, sometimes over multiple years. Using Passive project data from MA and PA, we will compare post-occupancy performance and construction cost to similar above-code and code built projects. We will also share takeaways gleaned from applying this same comparative analysis to publicly available benchmarking data in Philadelphia. Learn how passive is much more consistently hitting the range of performance we will need to decarbonize new buildings and hit state and national climate targets. Hear how on target passive heating and cooling modeling and performance often is, while occupant driven plug-loads and hot water still can pose a challenge. Discuss simple strategies for collecting more and better data that can demonstrate whether projects are achieving superior energy savings and occupant comfort.
Diversity and Inclusiveness
Katie is woman working at a non-profit advocacy organization that promotes equitable green building in the affordable housing market. Brendan is a emerging professional at a state agency promoting clean energy and energy efficiency in the built environment. The majority of examples of energy performance in this session will drawn from affordable housing multi-family passive projects.
Learning Objectives
Compare energy performance and construction cost of multiple Passive multifamily projects to code and LEED Certified projects.
Highlight why passive modeling is more predictive of energy performance than code or other green building standards.
Describe the difference between building loads and user-driven loads in passive projects.
Advocate for post-occupancy data requirements that demonstrate whether energy performance goals are being met in multifamily projects.
Has this session been presented before?
No
Target Audiences Level of Expertise
Level 2 - Some prior knowledge helpful.
Session Format Details
Presentation with slides, including case study examples, followed by Q and A: Would incorporate polls if that function is available in virtual platform chosen.

Strongest Content Connection - Boston 2021

Reviewer 1
Smith, Greg
Reviewer 2
Evans, Bryan
Curator
Craig, Beverly
Proposal #
161
Session #
716
Committee Decision
Accepted
Full Description
We are only now starting to get in multi-year performance data for multifamily passive projects in the Northeast. After years of cynicism that energy modeling in code built or LEED buildings is not particularly predictive of actual energy performance, building professionals would like real energy performance data showing there are not similar problems with performance of passive multifamily projects.