A prescriptive passive house standard for single-family homes
Comments
YES
YES I think this sounds great, prescriptive model for PHIUS brings barrier to entry costs like modelling down, and makes the Passive House standard more accessible. New standard, will probably be new material to most people so that's good. The prescriptive PHIUS path has the potential to really expand on the market penetration of the system & availability of standardized & replicable approach. I agree with Nick that part of what makes PHIUS a really aspirational standard is the performance based approach, but i also think that there needs to be a push to bring down the barriers to entry and make it more accessible to project teams and the general construction industry, and bring the benefits of passive house buildings to more people - and this seems like a step towards that end.
ROUND 1 DISCUSSION:
ROUND 1 DISCUSSION: Interested in hearing about how they landed on the prescriptive standard. (Nick). Not sold on this prescriptive approach (Nick). Are they just reading of standard or are they talking about why and relevance and consequences of switch. Need to work with speakers on this.
-Maybe- Going presecriptive
-Maybe- Going presecriptive with PH certification makes me uncomfortable. A big reason why I like PH is that it's based on the literal performance of the building and not a check list. I think folks can look up and read the new check-list online, so if this presentation is just an overview of that then I don't think it's worth the time. If it's getting more into the evolution of PH as a standard and why they've landed on this approach then I'm more interested. I want the history / story of how this was decided, not a presentation on the new check-list.