Understanding the Impact of Real-time Energy Management
Comments
Yes. This is the type of hand
Yes. This is the type of hand-on know and innovative technologies/deep dive that the industry and attendees need to see to get us to 40x30 while helping with LL97 compliance. Plus, we are having a young female professional in her own right presenting which is a great representation for women in an industry that is vastly male dominated!
ROUND 1 DISCUSSION: w/local
ROUND 1 DISCUSSION: w/local 97, these analytics are becoming more and more necessary. Proposal comparing buildings w/withou real time management. Maybe points: This is only one company represented: it would be good to get other perspectives. Suggestion: owner-manager. Also suggestion, from Jodi: to make sure the story of RT as a tool is told.
ROUND 2 DISCUSSION: [Awaiting
ROUND 2 DISCUSSION: [Awaiting Fatou's Round 2 notes.] Jeannine says owner perspective could probably be included. Not directly tied to Local Law 97. Maybe good to emphasize broader benefits, not just on NYSERDA, since they're restructuring their program. Want to try to get owner's perspective.
Spoke with the BrightPower
Spoke with the BrightPower team, (Rachael, Matthew, and Bestsy). Shared with them that they shoud add a different perspective of a building owner/manager perhaps on how these technologies were applied, what challenges were experienced, etc.
I learned that MoBIUS in an internal BrightPower RTEM on-going service, which makes it even more important to have a owner/manager perpetive who was involved in having their building data integrated and the value perhaps how their energy savings are more predictable in when compared to pre-RTEM.
They will include an overview/story of RTEM as a tool and the difference and/or how it compliments BMS and BAS systems.
The can deliver the session with Q&A in 60mins.
It was interesting that Rachel the presenter, did not ansswer any of my questions during this meeting but rather Matthew Murphey, Manager of MoBIUS did.
I would say yes for this
I would say yes for this session. I said NO to pre-recorded owner/manager participation, as it will be more valuable for have them present to provide their insights and also for Q&A. They all AGREED.
I will curate this session and make sure that the input shared is integrated on the final delivery
Maybe - I like the idea of
Maybe - I like the idea of presenting information on the study they performed. I like how the study was funded by and likely reviewed by NYSERDA - that adds a level of validity to this groups. However I would prefer to bring some other voices into the discussion. Perhaps bring in a building owner/manager on how these technologies were applied, what challenges were experienced, etc.