Christopher Pratt
Username
Christopher Pratt
Proposer First Name
Christopher
Proposer Email
chrpratt@sover.net
Proposer Last Name
Pratt
Proposer Phone
(802) 229-6880
Proposer Job Title
Owner
Proposer Additional Info
I am the one who developed the system for adding energy panels to existing windows. The ability to add glass to existing windows is what makes my company unique and why I am still in business.
Proposed Session Description
. The energy panel system is a method of double glazing used in modern factory-made windows since the late 50’s. A low-e energy panel lowers the u-value single glazed window from 1 to .35.
The session shows how this system is being successfully applied to a wide variety of existing pre-1990s windows. It will include an overview of the commercial success of this new technology and how it can be brought to scale and made more affordable in the future
Why is this session important?
The energy panel system is a good example of solutions that balance carbon reduction comfort cost and other social benefits. It is important to show case systems that have a very low carbon and how the acceptance of these new systems can change many of our assumptions about where we need to put our efforts in combating climate change. In terms of buildings, there are two roads to decarbonization, one is the reduction of carbon use by changing our source of energy (converting to heat pumps) and the other is the reduction of all types of energy we use in construction and materials as well as operations of buildings through weatherization and reducing the size of our living spaces.
We need to pursue both to achieve our goals, but the road less travel is the energy reduction. Conservation of energy or products is not incentivized in our economic system. This means mass transit, weatherization, denser settlement patterns and more multi-family housing are not getting the attention that they need. There are very few good affordable options when it comes to weatherizing existing windows. The energy panel system is one of the best ones and it is available on a limited basis today, It also has many other social benefits, like supporting local economies. It is affordable enough to make a significant improvement to the underperforming windows and storm windows in the majority of the existing houses throughout New England and the Northeast. Weatherization in general and windows in particular lack the attention and federal subsidies of more traditional capitalistic solutions that are based on building and consuming something new.
Diversity and Inclusiveness
Mostly this system is aimed specifically at training people in low income neighborhoods who will be able to take control of the window upgrades and future maintenance. The cost of entry into this business is comparatively low. It is not something that can be outsourced.
Learning Objectives
Participants will learn about a new system and approach to window weatherization.
We will explore the obstacles and opportunities that the system faces in scaling.
What role this system plays in the reduction of Co2
How the system fits into a circular economy model.
Has this session been presented before?
No
Target Audiences Level of Expertise
Level 2 - Some prior knowledge helpful.
NYC 2023 Areas of Focus
Session Format Details
It will be a 30 minute presentation followed by a 30 minute open discussion.
Recommended Length
60-minute session
Strongest Content Connection - NYC 2023
Comments about your speaker roster
I do not have anyone else who can speak on this topic because I am a sole proprietor and not many people know about this topic.
Anything else you'd like to tell us about your session proposal?
I am not hear to promote my business, but promote a method/system that i think works better than any other solution when it comes to decarbonizing buildings. I hope others will use in starting their own business. I am 66 years old and I would like nothing more than to be replaced by a group of young climate activist/entrepreneurs who will take this idea and run with it.
Reviewer 1
Bayer, Sara
Proposal #
127
Committee Decision
Rejected