Andrew Webster
Username
Andrew Webster
Proposer First Name
Andrew
Proposer Email
andrew@studio-webster.com
Proposer Last Name
Webster
Proposer Company/Organization
studioWEBSTER
Proposer Phone
(413) 835-1127
Boston 2022 Areas of Focus
Proposer Job Title
Principal
Proposer Additional Info
Bottom Lines business member and co-convener of the Anti-Racist Action Group on Botttom Lines Center
Proposed Session Description
In this session, we’ll address the impact of structural racism on our thinking about the work in front of us. Addressing climate change requires an “all hands on deck” approach from our industry, which means we can no longer ignore the impacts of structural racism on our work places and our own approaches to the work. White supremacy thinking is the water in which we swim - 400+ years of colonialization and systematic oppression are the legacy we have inherited. This affects even the way we do work when we’re doing our best to avoid overt discrimination and exclusionary behavior.
Together in this session, we’ll dig into the framework provided by the Candadian group COCo with their workbook “White Supremacy Culture in Organizations” (based on original work developed by Tema Okun at Dismantling Racism Works). They identify “perfectionist culture”, “only one right way” and “either/or thinking” as active tools of structural racism. But our industry, it seems, requires perfection of us in action and presentation. How is that racist? Isn’t that just “trying to our best”?
With this text as a basis, we’ll dig in together to tease out the impacts of three tools on our own practices, with an eye to creating better, more effective, more just approaches to sustainable design and construction. Based on the model of the Anti-Racist Action Group - an open sub-group of the Building Energy Bottom Lines community - we’ll work in small groups to think through the impacts of these mindsets, and to try to discover the work we can each do - ourselves and in our companies - to uproot them and create fertile ground for change.
Diversity and Inclusiveness
The white-identifying members of ARAG have tried to take on some of the burden of exploring the damaging structures of white supremacy. It is not up to the BIPOC community to educate us about the damage that structural racism causes, but up to us to open up the conversation more widely and address our selves, our communities and our shared approaches. While we also struggle at a policy / societal level, we have work to do at home. We hope the whole community will join us to explore this rich topic.
Learning Objectives
Identify the structures of white supremacy in our shared culture, and the means by which common behaviors perpetuate an exclusionary oppressive work environment.
Strategize ways to create anti-oppressive cultures within our businesses.
Find common cause with others struggling to improve our practice and business models.
Take the first steps (or the middle steps!) toward empowering our businesses to engage in real Climate Justice work.
Has this session been presented before?
No
Session Format
Collaborative problem-solving session
Session Format Details
Session is imagined in three parts: reading/small group/big group.
Introductions, rules of engagement, and presentation/reading of three tools of white supremacy culture. 00:20
Break into three groups to discuss. Facilitators participate in group work. 00:40
Bring it back home: report out from each group - what are some concrete ways we might change these habits? - and all-group facilitated discussion 00:30
Recommended Length
90-minute session
Strongest Content Connection - Boston 2022
Comments about your speaker roster
We’ve been practicing this form of reading and discussion together for about 18 months now as a Bottom Lines community, and are eager to bring this kind of interaction to BE Boston, to demonstrate one way of addressing the discomfort of living in / being victims of / being beneficiaries of a white supremacist society. Together, this work is still uncomfortable, but only practice makes it more familiar.
Anything else you'd like to tell us about your session proposal?
It's going to be awesome? We've done this together in groups of up to 15-20. It's surprisingly fun, weird, uncomfortable, and then delightfully fortifying. I imagine there are at least 3 of us facilitating, as this will warrant a steady hand on the scene. I'm a little nervous that some overt racist shit will happen, but that, too is part of the process.
Reviewer 1
Campbell, Beth
Proposal #
160
Committee Decision
Workshop
Presenters
Full Description
White supremacy thinking is the water swim in and the air we breathe, simply by being raised and living here and now. We can't help that fact, but we can work to overcome it.