Equitable Access to Cooling in New York City Under a Changing Climate
Comments
YES. Extremely important
YES. Extremely important session on equity and impacts on indoor cooling needs for communities who will see disproportionate health, economic in NYC.
I also like that, the presenters have data that was analyzed showcasing how current cooling usage patterns and evaluated strategies to meet the cooling needs for vulnerable populations while minimizing cost and energy demand.
ROUND 1 DISCUSSION: Cost of
ROUND 1 DISCUSSION: Cost of energy in low-income communities is profound. Needs to be discussed in ways that connects the dots. They have data, have analyzed what this means for our NYC communities. Wholistic approach, aligned to NESEA's goals. "Can't wait to learn more." NYSERDA speaker: might pull content towards policy? (Policy sub-group looking for more content.) HPD: New policy for cooling. Put this on the path to policy. Amanda Stevens is excellent speaker.
Yes - 90 min.
Yes - 90 min. Guidehouse responded to an RFP from NYSERDA about the future of cooling needs in NYC to help them develop their strategy over the next decade. This team used data from the NY State ClimAid report, as well as interviews with community groups such as WE ACT, Environmental Justice Alliance, Hope Program, and Million Trees program. The goal was to make recommentations for equitable cooling solutions that include factors such as AC saturation changes, impacts of tree planting, developing more cooling centers, HEEP programs, and impacts of heat on human health. They ultimately developed four scenarios for what the future of cooling could look like and made recommendations about how to provide cooling equitably. They have submitted a final draft report to NYSERDA and are awaiting comments. Speakers would include someone from NYSERDA, Guidehouse, and community organizations. Both Molly and Jim live out of state but said they would be able to present in-person in September. They would like a 90-minute session and I agree. This is an interesting and complicated policy session that raises larger questions about how we adapt to climate change and think holistically about costs and benefits. It's very high-level but the having a range of presenters and perspectives on this could be really compelling. This session may require some more hands-on attention from a conference committee member since the speakers have not yet been decided. It's a lot to cover in one session and they may need help to stay focused on certain take aways from the study, rather than trying to go over all of it's findings.
ROUND 2 discussion - Decade
ROUND 2 discussion - Decade-long strategy for cooling in NYC, how to supply cooling equitably. Emphasis on data. Report is complete. Working with community groups. New and compelling information. Looking at 20 minutes about the report, then speakers from NYSERDA and the community orgs. Hesitation: high level, not immediately applicable/actionable. Can they connect to current policy?
Yes, I think this touches
Yes, I think this touches upon a few imprtant topics in a nice holistic way